FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: ESSENTIALITY AND NEW CONTEXTUAL MEANINGS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2022.20.10

Keywords:

legislative documents, freedom of conscience, religious security, religious freedom, right to freedom, tolerance, vectors of liberty of conscience

Abstract

The article considers different approaches to the problem of freedom of conscience. As a result of the formed approaches, it can be established that the essence of research attitudes regarding freedom of conscience was mainly expressed in the model of the relationship "religious organization-person-state". Its leading idea can be considered a combination of two discursive directions of understanding freedom of conscience, which are directly related to each other – legal and axiological. Through the prism of various approaches correlated with modern scientific discourses, new contextual realities are proposed, within which freedom of conscience changes semantic nuances, being realized in the space of religious security, in its which is a free practice of faith by every person within the limits of the freedom of functioning of religious organizations is possible. It is emphasized that the essential features of freedom of conscience are influenced, firstly, by personal factors (worldview, religious traditions, etc.); secondly, confessional and inter-confessional communicative practices (both within the same denomination and at the inter-confessional level); thirdly, institutional "slices" (interactions in the processes of institutionalization), fourthly, state powers (observance of laws, consideration of international experience, prevention of abuse of religion, etc.). Their conceptualization is based on the existential-legal dominant, which largely determines their scientific discourse's content and main structural and semantic aspects. The affirmation and actualization of this discourse took place based on the synthesis of the domestic religious and legal tradition and pan-European humanistic and legal visions. Such a synthesis makes it possible to understand freedom of conscience not only as a worldview value, but also as a strategy for implementing religious security, thanks to which resistance to external and internal threats is possible.

References

Zakon Ukrayiny "Pro svobodu sovisti ta relihiyni orhanizatsiyi" URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/987-12#Text

Konstytutsiya Ukrayiny URL: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution

Babiy M. YU. Svoboda sovisti ta svoboda relihiyi: teoretychnyy aspekt. Sofiya. Humanitarno-relihiyeznavchyy visnyk. 2014. No2(2). S.10-14.

Dovira do tserkvy zalyshayetʹsya na tomu zh rivni – komu doviryayutʹ ukrayintsi u chasy viyny. Slovo pro slovo. Chrystianska gazeta. 31.10.2022. URL: https://slovoproslovo.info/dovira-do-tserkvi-zalishaetsya-na-tomu-zh-rivni-komu-doviryayut-ukraintsi-u-chasi-viyni

Kolodnyy A.M., Fylypovych L.O. Kontseptsiya relihiynoyi bezpeky: metodolohichni pidkhody akademichnoho relihiyeznavstva // Sofiya. Humanitarno-relihiyeznavchyy visnyk. No2(16). 2020. S.19-23.

Leshan V.YU. Osnovy relihiyeznavstva. URL: https://subject.com.ua/philosophy/religion/32.html

Predko O.I. Vstup // Relihiyna bezpeka v Ukrayini v umovakh koronavirusnoyi pandemiyi. Monohrafiya. Vinnytsya, vyd-vo FOP Kushnir YU.V, 2021. 204 s.

Stepanenko V. Suspilʹnyy dosvid i smysly rosiysʹko-ukrayinsʹkoyi viyny: sotsiolohichni interpretatsiyi //Ukrayinsʹke suspilʹstvo v umovakh viyny. 2022: Kolektyvna monohrafiya /S. Dembitsʹkyy, O. Zlobina, N. Kostenko ta in.; za red. chlen.-kor. NAN Ukrayiny, d. filos. n. YE. Holovakhy, d. sots. n. S. Makeyeva. Kyyiv: Instytut sotsiolohiyi NAN Ukrayiny, 2022. 410 s. C.25-34.

Kharʹkovshchenko YE.A., Predko O.I., Turenko V.E., Nesterova M.I. Relihiyna bezpeka u sviti ta Ukrayini pid chas COVID-19: sotsiolohichnyy aspekt // Bezpeka, relihiya, tserkva v suchasnomu suspilʹstvi. Monohrafiya. Vinnytsya, 2021. Vydavnytstvo FOP Kushnir YU.V., 2021. S.9-46.

Predko D., Predko O. Imperatives of Spirituality: Essence and Key Meanings //Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy. 2020. No 10(1). P.69-78.

Published

2023-03-04

How to Cite

Nesterova, M. (2023). FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: ESSENTIALITY AND NEW CONTEXTUAL MEANINGS. SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 20(2), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2022.20.10

Similar Articles

<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.