WHITE BROTHERHOOD, EMBASSY OF GOD, AND HASIDISM IN THE INFORMATIONAL SPACE OF UKRAINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2025.26.2

Keywords:

religious movements, informational space, White Brotherhood, Embassy of God, Hasidism, media representation, eligious tolerance, strategic communication

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d . This article explores the specifics of the informational representation of three religious movements – White Brotherhood, Embassy of God, and Hasidism – in the Ukrainian media landscape. The relevance of the study stems from the transformation of the informational environment under conditions of post-totalitarian pluralism, hybrid threats, and religious polyvalence. Special attention is paid to how mass media construct the image of religious"otherness" and influence public attitudes toward religious communities in the context of interfaith interaction and information security.

M e t o d s . The study is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines tools from religious studies, sociology of religion, media studies, and critical discourse analysis. A comparative-historical method is used to trace the origins and transformations of the movements, while a structural-functional approach identifies their social roles. Content analysis of both traditional and digital media is employed alongside the principles of strategic communication theory.

R e s u l t s . The findings demonstrate that the White Brotherhood is represented as a destructive cult with esoteric-apocalyptic traits; the Embassy of God is portrayed as a charismatic religious movement with social outreach but also a controversial media image; and Hasidism is framed as a traditional branch of Judaism, perceived simultaneously as part of cultural heritage and a target of domestic criticism. The media representation of these movements significantly affects interethnic relations, the level of religious tolerance, and civic trust amid wartime conditions and social polarization.

C o n c l u s i o n s . The representation of religious communities in the media serves not only aninformative but also a normative function, shaping public perceptions of legitimacy, threat, or acceptability of religious "otherness." The article substantiates the need to develop an ethical media code for the coverage of religious topics, which would help reduce stigmatization, strength enstrategic communication, and foster interfaith dialogue in Ukraine.

References

Furkalo, V. S., & Furkalo, V. I. (2012). Conceptual forms of Hasidism. PP Zhovtyy O. O. [in Ukrainian].

Kharkovshchenko, Y., & Turenko, V. (2024). Spesifics of religious security in the(pre)war conditions in Ukraine: The task for humanitarian policy. Sophia. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 23(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2024.23.13

Kharkovshchenko, Y., Kostiuk, O., Piletsky, E., Zubchyk, O., & Turenko, V. (2024). Thereligious landscape amidst warfare in Ukraine: Assessing

the situation. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, Article 2024ss0728. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0728

Kolodny, A. M. (2007). The Phenomenon of Christian Postmodernity. University Scientific Notes, 3, 312–323 [in Ukrainian].

Korobka, G., & Lazarev, V. (2009). The use of modern information technologies by charismatic churches. Scientific notes of the National University "Ostroh Academy". Series: Culture and Social Communications, 1, 77–87 [in Ukrainian].

List of legal entities – religious organizations that are critically important for the functioning of the economy and ensuring the livelihoods of the population during a special period, Order of the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (2025, June 6) [in Ukrainian]. https://dess.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2025.06.06_Perelik.pdf

Petrushkevych, M. S. (2014). Religious communication in the context of media culture. Anthropological Dimensions of Philosophical Research, 5, 56–68 [in Ukrainian].

Piletsky, E. & Nesterova, M. (2024). Peculiarities of interfaith relations in Ukraine in the(pre)war period: On the way to dialogue. Sophia. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 1(23), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2024.23.12

Predko, O. & Predko D. (2024). Religious security: its essence and main factors (Ukrainian context). Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern

Europe, 44, 3, 58–73. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=2516&context=ree

Skulysh, E. D., Ostroukhov, V. V., Prysyazhnyuk, M. M., Petryk, V. M., Kompantseva, L. F., & Boyko, O. D. (2023). Suggestive technologies of

manipulative influence. Skif [in Ukrainian].

Voynalovych, V., Yelensky, V., Kyryushko, M., Kochan, N., Rublyova, N. (2012). Religious factor in the processes of nation- and state-building: The experience of modern Ukraine. Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies named after I. F. Kuras, NAS of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].

https://ipiend.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/religion-factor_site_148.pdf

Zdioruk, S. I., & Tokman, V. V. (2023). State-Church and Socio-Religious Relations in the conditions of Russia's war against Ukraine: Analytical Report (S. I. Zdioruk, Ed.). National Institute for Strategic Studies [in Ukrainian].

Published

2026-02-20

How to Cite

VALIUKH, D., & MELNYCHUK, Y. (2026). WHITE BROTHERHOOD, EMBASSY OF GOD, AND HASIDISM IN THE INFORMATIONAL SPACE OF UKRAINE. SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 26(2), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2025.26.2