RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE: ESSENCE AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2023.21.8

Keywords:

religious experience, knowledge, religious faith, sensory experience, epistemological value

Abstract

he article is devoted to various theories that confirm or deny the epistemological value of a person's religious experience. The works of the classics of the psychology of religion and the works of modern analytical philosophers regarding the cognitive status of religious experience are considered. According to many researchers of religion, the phenomenon of religious experience is one of the fundamental elements of religion because it is present in almost all traditions of all times and peoples, and accordingly it is through the explanation and understanding of religious experience that it is possible to form a more comprehensive idea of the phenomenon of religion in general. For this reason, so many works are devoted to the study of religious experience. One of the discourses that has not lost its relevance for decades is the discourse on the epistemological capacity of religious experience. This question is acute because, on the one hand, having proved that religious experience can be a source of knowledge about its object, we can speak much more confidently in favor of the existence of such an object, on the other hand, an exhaustive refutation of the cognitive capacity of religious experience can lead to to diametrically opposite consequences. The article demonstrates the diversity of approaches to considering the epistemological possibilities of religious experience, both those that testify in favor of its epistemological value and those that deny it, and contains an overview of the most significant conclusions of scientists on this issue. Special attention is paid to the work of modern American researchers as the last ones who significantly contributed to the study of this topic. The study also demonstrates that this topic has the potential for its further consideration and research in our scientific environment, since it is in this way that it is almost not found in the works of Ukrainian researchers.

References

Predko, O. I. (2014). Relihiinyi dosvid osobystisnyi vymir. [Religious experience: Personal dimension.] Sophia. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 1, 21-25 [in Ukrainian].

Predko, O. I. (2021). Relihiinyi dosvid [Religious experience]. Great Ukrainian encyclopedia. Retrieved from: https://vue.gov.ua/Релігійний_ досвід. [in Ukrainian].

Samygin, S.I., Nechypurenko, V.N., & Polonskaya, I.N. (1996). Relyhyovedenye sotsyolohyia y psykholohyia relyhyy [Religious studies: sociology and psychology of religion]. Rostov-na-Donu: Phoenix [in Russian]

Torchynov, E. O. (2007). Relyhyy myra opyt zapredelnoho [Religions of the world: the experience of the overseas.] Saint Petersburg: Academia [in Russian].

Torchynov, E. O. (1998). Mystycheskyi (transpersonalnyi) opyt i metafyzyka [Mystical (transpersonal) experience and metaphysics]. Retrieved from: https://bookshake.net/r/misticheskiy-transpersonalnyy-opyt-i-metafizika-evgeniy-alekseevich-torchinov?page=14. [in Russian].

Alston, W. (1993). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

James, W. (2018). The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Mineola: Dover Publications.

Swinburne, R. (1996). Is there a God?. New York: Oxford.

Plantinga, A. (1981). Is Belief in God Properly Basic? Nous, 15, 41–51.

Webb, M. (2011). Religious experience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religious-experience/.

Published

2023-08-15

How to Cite

Лавинюкова, А.-В. Р. (2023). RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE: ESSENCE AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES. SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 21(1), 30-33. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2023.21.8