A VIEW ON PARENT–CHILD RELATIONSHIPS IN DEMOCRITUS' LEGACY: ETHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF REFLECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2025.26.16Keywords:
Democritus, parenthood, childhood, ethics, education, human being, history of philosophy, ancient philosophyAbstract
B a c k g r o u n d . The article presents a philosophical and ethical analysis of Democritus' views on the phenomena of parenthood and childhood. The starting point of the study is the philosopher's ambivalent attitude toward procreation, which he perceives both as a natural necessity of living beings and as a potential source of suffering. The author demonstrates that Democritus' concept reveals a profound interconnection between biological instincts and cultural norms, while also outlining significant aspects of parental responsibility in shaping future generations.
M e t h o d s . The research employs ethical-anthropological, historical-philosophical, and hermeneutical approaches. The analysis is based on fragments preserved in the works of Stobaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Theodoret, and other authors, and is conducted within the broader context of ancient pedagogical and ethical traditions. This methodological framework makes it possible to disclose both the ontological dimensions of Democritus' teaching on procreation and the socio-cultural implications of his reflections on upbringing and inheritance.
R e s u l t s . The article substantiates that, for Democritus, procreation is simultaneously a natural necessity and a socio-cultural convention: it is inherent to all living beings, yet in human life it assumes the form of a cultural norm. At the same time, the philosopher emphasizes the risks and difficulties of parenthood, which may hinder an individual's spiritual self-realization. His reflections reveal a duality of assessment, ranging from the recognition of the universality of parental instinct to a radical critique of familial obligations as factors that distract from the pursuit of philosophical life.
C o n c l u s i o n s . The author concludes that Democritus' legacy concerning parenthood and education outlines fundamental issues regarding the relationship between nature and culture, instinct and moral choice. His teaching shows that parenthood is not merely a biological fact but also an ethical task, closely connected with the formation of a virtuous personality. In this sense, Democritus' reflections remain relevant in contemporary humanitarian discourse, as they highlight the nature of responsibility, the role of education, and the boundaries of material provision in the context of shaping a harmonious individual.
References
Alexandrini, C. (1857). Opera quae exstant omnia. Stromata I–IV. Quis dives salvetur. Fragmenta (T. 1). J.-P. Migne.
Berkel, T. van (2020). The Ethical Life of a Fragment: Three Readings of Protagoras’ Man Measure Statement. In D. C. Wolfsdorf (Ed.), Early Greek Ethics (pp. 74–109). Oxford University Press.
Diels, H., & Kranz, W. (1912). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Bd. 2). Weidmannsche Buchhandlung. Edmonds, R. (2020). The Ethics of Afterlife in Classical Greek Thought. In D. C. Wolfsdorf (Ed.), Early Greek Ethics (pp. 545–565). Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. R. (2020). The Ethical Maxims of Democritus of Abdera. In D. C. Wolfsdorf (Ed.), Early Greek Ethics (pp. 211–242). Oxford University Press.
Laurent, J. (2017). L’enfance dans l’Antiquité. Archives de philosophie, 80(4), 629–632. https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.804.0629
Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S., & McKenzie, R. (Eds.) (1940). A Greek-English Lexicon. Clarendon Press. https://areopage.net/PDF/LSJ.pdf
Luria, S. (2016). Democritus. (C. C. W. Taylor, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Schofield, M. (2012). Infancy and childhood in ancient Greek philosophy. Hellenic Society. https://www.hellenicsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/ 2012/09/INFANCY-AND-CHILDHOOD-final.pdf
Stobaios, I. (1823). Anthologion: Ioannis Stobæi Florilegium (Vol. II). Bibliopolio Kuehniano.
Stobaios, I. (1824). Anthologion: Ioannis Stobæi Florilegium (Vol. IV). Bibliopolio Kuehniano.
Stobaios, I. (1825). Anthologion: Ioannis Stobæi Florilegium (Vol. III). Bibliopolio Kuehniano.
Theodoreti. (1904). Graecarum affectionum curatio. B. G. Teubner.
Therme, A.-L. (2017). Figures présocratiques de l’enfant. Archives de philosophie, 80(4), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.804.0633
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
