R. BELLAH'S CONCEPT OF "CIVIL RELIGION": IDENTIFICATION FEATURES AND MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2023.22.7

Keywords:

civil religion, Robert Bellah, interpretations of civil religion, American civil religion, religious nationalism

Abstract

The article examines the nuances in the definition of "civil religion" as posited by American sociologist Robert Bellah. The situational drivers for its emergence include: a) the necessity for a theoretical framework while elucidating the dynamics of religion and politics in the US to Japanese students, and b) addressing the societal challenges the US faced due to the Vietnam War. R. Bellah's ideological foundation for reshaping "civil religion" is attributed to: drawing inspiration from the works of J.-J. Rousseau, and integrating theories from A. de Tocqueville, E. Durkheim, and S. Mead. The study proposes the existence of five methodological strategies discernible in Bellah's three publications: "Civil Religion in America" (1967), "Broken Covenant. American Civil Religion in Time of Trial" (1975), and "Religion and Legitimation of the American Republic" (1978). A comprehensive critique of Bellah's five distinct interpretations of civil religion is presented, evaluating their substantive coherence. The underlying reasons for shifts in Bellah's delineations of civil religion are outlined. This paper underscores the conceptual fragmentation and the aspiration for functional refinement in Bellah's portrayal of "civil religion". Reasons for Bellah's subsequent discontinuation of the term "civil religion" from the mid-1980s are also explored.

References

Bellah, R. N. (2005). Civil Religion in America. Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 134(4), 40–55.

Bellah, R. N. (2005). God, Nation, and Self in America: some tensions between Parsons and Bellah. In H. J. Bershady, R. C. Fox, & V. M. Lidz (Eds.). After Parsons. A theory of social action for the twenty-first century. Russell Sage Foundation, 2005 (pp. 137–148).

Bellah, R. N. (1985). Habits of the Heart: individualism and commitment in american life. University of California Press (p. XLVII).

Bellah, R. N. (1973). Introduction. In Е. Durkheim. On Morality and Society. Selected Writings. The university of Chicago Press (pp. IX–LV).

Bellah, R. N. (1980). Religion and the Legitimation of the American Republic (Chapter 1). In R. N. Bellah, & Ph. E. Hammond (Eds.). Varieties of Civil Religion. Harper & Row (pp. 3–23).

Bellah, R. N. (1975). The Broken Covenant: American Civil Religion in Time of Trial. Seabury Press.

Cristi, M. (2001). From civil to political religion: The intersection of culture, religion and politics. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

Durkheim, Е. (1973). Individualism and the Intellectuals. In On Morality and Society. Selected Writings. The univehsity of Chicago press (pp. 43–57).

Durkheim, E. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (K. E. Fields, Transl.). Free Press.

Fenn, R. K. (1976). Bellah and the new orthodoxy. Sociological Analysis, 37(2), 160–166.

Fenn, R. K. (1978). Toward a Theory of Secularization. The Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.

Gorski, P. S. (2017). American Covenant: a history of civil religion from the puritans to the present. Princeton University Press.

Haberski, R. (2012). God and War. american civil religion since 1945. Rutgers University press.

Hart, R. P. (1977). The political pulpit. West Lafayette. Purdue University Press.

Herberg, W. (1974). America's civil religion: what it is and whence it comes. In R. E. Richey, & D. G. Jones (Eds.). American Civil Religion. Harper and Row (pp. 76–88).

Jones, D. G., & Richey, R. E. (1974). In R. E. Richey, & D. G. Jones (Eds.). American Civil Religion. Harper and Row (pp. 3–18).

Mead, S. E. (1963). The Lively Experiment: the shaping of christianity in America. Harper & Row.

Thomas, M. C., & Flippen, Ch. C. (1972). American civil religion: an empirical study. Social Forces, 51(2). 218–225.

Parashchevin M. A. (2017) The concept of civil religion as a cognitive construct and political tool. Social technologies: current problems of theory and practice, 74, 143–154 [in Ukrainian].

Published

2024-04-25

How to Cite

Sarapin, A., & Piletsky, E. (2024). R. BELLAH’S CONCEPT OF "CIVIL RELIGION": IDENTIFICATION FEATURES AND MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS. SOPHIA. Human and Religious Studies Bulletin, 22(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.17721/sophia.2023.22.7